Showing posts with label trade dress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trade dress. Show all posts

Tuesday, 27 May 2014

Balenciaga, The French Fashion House, Sues Designer Steven Madden over Copycat Bag.


Balenciaga, the former Haute Couture, Paris-based fashion house has filed a law suit (May 20th 2014) against the footwear company Steven Madden Ltd in the Southern District of New York, alleging that the footwear brand has manufactured, advertised, offered for sale and sold bags which replicate and violate the trade dress of its recognised Motorcycle bag shown below.  


Designed by Nicolas Ghesquière, (the now current creative director of LMVH), Balenciaga has been selling the iconic classic bag since 2000. According to the lawsuit, Balenciaga has accused the Madden brand of copying “the shapes and design elements of Balenciaga’s Classic Bag, and producing a bag featuring identical or nearly identical shapes and design elements but sold at a significantly lower price.” Unlike in the UK, the US does not have design protection, which protects design right the three-dimensional shape of a design. Therefore in the US, the motorcycle bag is protected by what is called trade dress – a subset of trademark law, which can be used to protect the overall appearance of an item. This extends to features such as size, shape, colour or colour combinations of a product or anything that creates the overall look and feel of a brand in the marketplace. 

In order to be successful in a trade dress lawsuit it is essential that the consumer believes that the trade dress is a source indicator of distinguishing the goods and services of one from those of others. The trade dress issue here relates to the front design of the Motorcycle bag which was federally registered in 2007. Importantly the features which make up the trade dress in question must not serve a utility or function outside of creating recognition in the consumer's mind. Looking at the design below, the Goss-IPgirl wonders whether this is merely functional or actually a recognisable indicator of source?

Balenciaga’s registered Classic Bag Trade Dress drawing

Balenciaga argue that the Classic Bag Trade Dress depicted above originate exclusively with them. And that the Balenciaga Classic Bag Trade Dress is unique, inherently distinctive and non-functional. Interestingly, this is not the first time that Balenciaga the Parisian fashion house has filed has a lawsuit against the Steve Madden, Ltd, the founder of the NYC footwear company that bears his name. In late 2009, Balenciaga filed a lawsuit against Steve Madden for allegedly copying the label's multicolor Lego heels from the fall 2007 collection. 
Also in 2009, Alexander McQueen also filed (and subsequently settled) a lawsuit against Madden for copying its black Faithful bootie. 
The case also draws attention to the NYC based footwear company’s reputation for producing knock-off designs. Balenciaga argue that the Steve Madden brand has operated “a pattern of misappropriation of Balenciaga’s designs, most recently with the copying of the Balenciaga’s CREEPER shoe design.” 



Balenciaga [Left] Steve Madden [Right]

What this shows is that contrary to the belief that luxury fashion houses are not concerned about fast fashion companies imitating their design, luxury and other higher-end companies are willing to protect their designs & revenues against companies down the lower end of the food chain.

Balenciaga has asked the New York federal court to prevent Steve Madden from producing the “studied copy” of its Motorcycle bag. In the lawsuit, it is alleged that such sales “can confuse customers, create a false impression that Steven Madden's products are Balenciaga's, and hurt the French company's goodwill, reputation and sales.” 

The case is Balenciaga v. Steven Madden Ltd et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 14-03627.

Tuesday, 12 November 2013

Prada v Perfume Fragrance Inc; Smells Like Another Perfume Knock-Off Case

Smells like perfume litigation is in the air again, according to the telegraph, the Italian fashion house Prada is bringing a legal claim against, Preferred Fragrance Inc - a company that specialises in making affordable designer knock-off scents, which emulate or resemble the fragrances of famous top-end perfumes.

Prada claims Preferred has violated its Prada Candy copyright when the company came out with Party Candy perfume, and they also state that the fragrance is a knock off of its trademark. Prada Candy retails for $82,  and the Party Candy fragrance at a much cheaper price of $3.99.

The Goss-IP girl has done some research and the name of the Prada candy perfume is trademarked, so the packaging may be protected trade dress, the text on the box may be copyrighted,  on face value the Goss-IP girl notes that there are clear similarities between the packaging of the two boxes, there are slight differences, but these are nominal and given the similarity of the trade dress between the two fragrances, it will be interesting to see what the courts make of this.

License to s[m]ell?
Different countries have different laws relating to protection of perfumes, however, generally, it is not illegal to create or distribute smell-alikes. In terms of copyright, the chemical composition of perfumes are not treated as a tangible form of expression to claim copyright protection. Instead, disputes between the perfume brands and copycats are resolved by assessing circumstances for trademark infringement, trade dress or unfair competition.

Looking at the two fragrances below the Goss-IP girl wonders: if you think Prada does have a case?